miss_andrist

Fun stuff here :)

Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:19:07 GMT

Q: Why do men name their penises?
A: Because they don't like the idea of having a stranger make 99% of their decisions.

Q: What does a man consider to be a seven course meal?
A: A hot dog and a six pack.

Q: Why is it good that there are female astronauts?
A: When the crew gets lost in space, at least the woman will ask for directions.

Q: What's the best thing to come out of a penis?
A: The wrinkles!

Q: How did the angry guy try to kill his pet bird?
A: Throw it off a cliff.

Q: Why do men like BMWs?
A: They can spell it.

Q: What does a smart guy do in an M&M factory?
A: Proofread.

Q: Why did the man fill his waterbed with beer?
A: He wanted a foam mattress.

Q: Why are all dumb blond jokes one liners?
A: So men can understand them.

Q: What is the difference between Government Bonds and men?
A: Government Bonds mature.

Q: What's a man's idea of helping with the housework?
A: Lifting his legs so that you can vacuum.

Q: What does a man say when he looks in a box of Cheerios?
A: "Oh look, donut seeds!"

Q: Why are men like paper cups?
A: They're dispensable

Q: Why do Blonde Women have bruises around their navels?
A: Blonde men are stupid too.

Q: How do you force a man to do situps?
A: Put the remote between his toes.

Q: Why is psychoanalysis a lot quicker for men than for women?
A: When it's time to go back to his childhood, he's already there.

Q: What did God say after she created man?
A: "I can do better than this" and she made woman.

Q: How do men define a "50/50" relationship?
A: We (women) cook/they (men) eat; we clean/they dirty; we iron/they wrinkle.

Here's a good putdown line for woman:
A man walks up and says haven't we met before?
Say "YES, I'm the receptionist at the VD Clinic".

Q: Why are men like commercials?
A: You can't believe a word they say.

Q: Why is food better than men?
A: Because you don't have to wait an hour for seconds.

Q: Why do women fake orgasm?
A: Because men fake foreplay.

Q: Why do men prefer blondes?
A: Men always like intellectual company

Q: Why are women so bad at mathematics?
A: Because men keep telling them that this...

<-------------------------->

...is 12 inches.

Q: What's the difference between a bar and a clitoris?
A: Most men have no trouble finding a bar.

Q: What do you call a man with 90% of his intelligence gone?
A: Divorced

Q: What do you call a woman without an asshole?
A: Divorced.

Q: What is the difference between
a) a toilet
b) the 'g' spot
c) wedding anniversaries
A: Nothing really -- men seem to miss them all!

Training

Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:05:52 GMT

I have been well trained by the patriarchy, and its agents. Patriarchs - fathers, teachers, doms, preachers, bosses, gurus - taught me my place. From them I learned:

I am submissive.
I like being submissive.
My greatest joy in life and where I find my true self is in service to another, be that: wife; personal pet; maid; baby maker; child care worker; mother; sex toy; ornament for his arm; constant companion; a good listener; secretary; unpaid personal assistant. Doing all these things without a shred of resentment will make me spiritual, holy, a giver, pure, elevated in gods sight, womanly, mature, and good. Refusing to do these things, or doing them with anger and resentment, makes me bad, a whore, a slut, selfish, a bitch, a sinner, a rebellious woman, hellbound, materialistic, self-sentered, degraded, and debauched.
As a woman, I am inherently a masochist.
I enjoy being hit.
I enjoy being tied up and "pretend" raped.
I enjoy having my privates tortured.
These things are fulfilling and inherently arousing to me. It is natural and good for me to crave physcial abuse as a way to reach sexual satisfaction. It's my "orientation" and I should quit fighting it.
BDSM is not abuse. It is consensual. See? http://www.evilmonk.org/A/abuse00.cfm (Love the bit at the end, where it is her fault she didn't leave him. He killed her because she didn't have the courage to leave, the stupid, masochistic, weepy victim personality type woman. Not because beating a woman close to you isn't considered a serious enough crime to put the man in jail for it - not because her family and friends didn't want to help her with her financial needs so that she was able to leave without making her children suffer - but because she just wouldn't leave. Oh and never mind that most killings in such relationships happen BECAUSE she left. If the dumb bitches would just give up everything they have to get away from asshole men everything would be solved. It's all their fault.)
See, my ex always had safe sex with me, I consented to being tortured to the point of screams and hysterical tears, nothing we did was illegal, the situation was controlled, and my friends were all fine with me acting as a slave to him in public so it did't interfere with my friendships. So it wasn't abuse. I wanted it. I am naturally this way. This is who I am.
http://www.sscn.org/abuse.html "D/s frees a submissive from the restraints of years of vanilla conditioning to explore a buried part of herself."

My desire to be touched gently, sweetly, kindly, without being hurt is vanilla conditioning. I have been unfairly burying the part of me that is my true self that wants to be tied up, beaten and raped. "Allowing" myself to be someone's sex slave and be tied up, ordered around, beaten and raped will let me be free to finally be myself.
Who I really am is a sex slave.

Except for those days when who I really am is who God (male) made me to be: a submissive, sweet, wife who stays at home with her children, cooking, cleaning, and reading the Bible for recreation.
Who I really am inside is a woman who just wants to be normal and happy and clean and chaste.
That is my real place in the world. That is who I am.

What is unacceptable is feminism.
What is unacceptable is me dictating my own boundaries, declaring my own freedoms, and doing what I want.
What is unacceptable is me living without a patriarch telling me what I am allowed to do.
Living this way shows I am either neurotic and repressed or insane and out of control and lost in sin.

BDSM and Fundamentalism are two sides of the same coin. Both run almost entirely by patriarchs. Both hierarchal, based on male dominance and female submission (with a few female exceptions allowed to create the illusion of equality so as to shut up any naysayers), both claiming to be natural and normal and preaching/teaching the subordinates (mainly women) that knuckling under will be what makes them happiest, that as soon as they realize their place in the world, and stop fighting God/their true desires, everything else will just fall into place for them. That any lingering doubts or questions come from listeining to the world/repressed vanilla people and they are doing a great, wonderful, rebellious thing by resisting.

I'm done with both of these.

Heh...

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:29:39 GMT

http://adonismirror.com/10152006_leader_misandry_and_misanthropy.htm

Hillary Clinton

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:12:29 GMT

I have decided that yes, I will vote for her, even though in many ways I think she is a mere mouthpiece for the Democratic party. Yes, I'm going to vote for her BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN. Oh noes, oh horrors, how could I do such a thing?

Well, I think it is important that feminists show our support for a woman. Consider also how many people are going to vote against her just because she is a woman. And you know those guys will. Already the chorus from "liberal nice guys" is all about how horrible that ugly old shrew is, and how much better Saint Obama is. They are liberal and have always voted Democrat no matter how lackluster the candidate, but now that it is Hillary (note they always use her first name, not her last) it is suddenly someone who is too whatever for them. Their real problem is that she is a woman, but they won't admit it. I mean come on - some of these are the same people who insisted that we third party voters should hold our noses and vote for Kerry, in spite of his positions, which were hardly liberal and which match up almost exactly with Hillary's positions. Hillary is a good little Democratic Party Shill and is no different from Kerry except in that she is female and has a history of being First Lady to the last Democratic President (who, incidentally, was wildly popular and had a very successful administration).

Loook at the vile hatred being poured out towards Hillary Clinton! I shan't provide links but it is easy enough to find. The latest insult I've seen directed at her is "Hildog". Now politics gets ugly, but is anyone comparing Barack (I am going to use his first name since everyone calls Ms. Clinton "Hillary") to a dog this early in the campaign? Has anyone brought up Barack's looks? Has anyone brought up his spouse?

Now, for a win-win situation I think Hillary and Barack should run together. Then the liberal dudes would feel like they had to vote for them to prove they don't hate black people (even though they don't really care.)

But imagine, if you have a daughter, what it will feel like for her to look on a picture of the very first female American President.

And consider how shameful it is that we still haven't had that first. Consider how many other countries have had a female ruler in the last hundred years. http://www.guide2womenleaders.com/Female_Leaders.htm . Gee, I thought we prided ourselves on being so progressive and giving women so much freedom and being so "equalist" and all. Funny how that never applies to women having any position of actualy power, but only to how much clothing we are allowed/supposed to take off.

But oh here, look at this "witty" "satire": "Female Heads of State: Hot or Not?"

http://www.thespeciousreport.com/2006/06060912hotornot11.html

Yeah you're just rolling in the aisles, yeah?

S.C.U.M. Manifesto; Part one

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:50:11 GMT

S.C.U.M. Manifesto

(Society for Cutting Up Men)

by Valerie Solanas

Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and destroy the male sex.
It is now technically feasible to reproduce without the aid of males (or, for that matter, females) and to produce only females. We must begin immediately to do so. Retaining the mail has not even the dubious purpose of reproduction. The male is a biological accident: the Y (male) gene is an incomplete X (female) gene, that is, it has an incomplete set of chromosomes. In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion, aborted at the gene stage. To be male is to be deficient, emotionally limited; maleness is a deficiency disease and males are emotional cripples.
The male is completely egocentric, trapped inside himself, incapable of empathizing or identifying with others, or love, friendship, affection of tenderness. He is a completely isolated unit, incapable of rapport with anyone. His responses are entirely visceral, not cerebral; his intelligence is a mere tool in the services of his drives and needs; he is incapable of mental passion, mental interaction; he can't relate to anything other than his own physical sensations. He is a half-dead, unresponsive lump, incapable of giving or receiving pleasure or happiness; consequently, he is at best an utter bore, an inoffensive blob, since only those capable of absorption in others can be charming. He is trapped in a twilight zone halfway between humans and apes, and is far worse off than the apes because, unlike the apes, he is capable of a large array of negative feelings -- hate, jealousy, contempt, disgust, guilt, shame, doubt -- and moreover, he is aware of what he is and what he isn't.
Although completely physical, the male is unfit even for stud service. Even assuming mechanical proficiency, which few men have, he is, first of all, incapable of zestfully, lustfully, tearing off a piece, but instead is eaten up with guilt, shame, fear and insecurity, feelings rooted in male nature, which the most enlightened training can only minimize; second, the physical feeling he attains is next to nothing; and third, he is not empathizing with his partner, but is obsessed with how he's doing, turning in an A performance, doing a good plumbing job. To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo. It's often said that men use women. Use them for what? Surely not pleasure.
Eaten up with guilt, shame, fears and insecurities and obtaining, if he's lucky, a barely perceptible physical feeling, the male is, nonetheless, obsessed with screwing; he'll swim through a river of snot, wade nostril-deep through a mile of vomit, if he thinks there'll be a friendly pussy awaiting him. He'll screw a woman he despises, any snaggle-toothed hag, and furthermore, pay for the opportunity. Why? Relieving physical tension isn't the answer, as masturbation suffices for that. It's not ego satisfaction; that doesn't explain screwing corpses and babies.
Completely egocentric, unable to relate, empathize or identify, and filled with a vast, pervasive, diffuse sexuality, the male is pyschically passive. He hates his passivity, so he projects it onto women, defines the make as active, then sets out to prove that he is (`prove that he is a Man'). His main means of attempting to prove it is screwing (Big Man with a Big Dick tearing off a Big Piece). Since he's attempting to prove an error, he must `prove' it again and again. Screwing, then, is a desperate compulsive, attempt to prove he's not passive, not a woman; but he is passive and does want to be a woman.
Being an incomplete female, the male spends his life attempting to complete himself, to become female. He attempts to do this by constantly seeking out, fraternizing with and trying to live through an fuse with the female, and by claiming as his own all female characteristics -- emotional strength and independence, forcefulness, dynamism, decisiveness, coolness, objectivity, assertiveness, courage, integrity, vitality, intensity, depth of character, grooviness, etc -- and projecting onto women all male traits -- vanity, frivolity, triviality, weakness, etc. It should be said, though, that the male has one glaring area of superiority over the female -- public relations. (He has done a brilliant job of convincing millions of women that men are women and women are men). The male claim that females find fulfillment through motherhood and sexuality reflects what males think they'd find fulfilling if they were female.
Women, in other words, don't have penis envy; men have pussy envy. When the male accepts his passivity, defines himself as a woman (males as well as females thing men are women and women are men), and becomes a transvestite he loses his desire to screw (or to do anything else, for that matter; he fulfills himself as a drag queen) and gets his dick chopped off. He then achieves a continuous diffuse sexual feeling from `being a woman'. Screwing is, for a man, a defense against his desire to be female. He is responsible for:
War: The male's normal compensation for not being female, namely, getting his Big Gun off, is grossly inadequate, as he can get it off only a very limited number of times; so he gets it off on a really massive scale, and proves to the entire world that he's a `Man'. Since he has no compassion or ability to empathize or identify, proving his manhood is worth an endless amount of mutilation and suffering and an endless number of lives, including his own -- his own life being worthless, he would rather go out in a blaze of glory than to plod grimly on for fifty more years.
Niceness, Politeness, and `Dignity': Every man, deep down, knows he's a worthless piece of shit. Overwhelmed by a sense of animalism and deeply ashamed of it; wanting, not to express himself, but to hide from others his total physicality, total egocentricity, the hate and contempt he feels for other men, and to hide from himself the hate and contempt he suspects other men feel for him; having a crudely constructed nervous system that is easily upset by the least display of emotion or feeling, the male tries to enforce a `social' code that ensures perfect blandness, unsullied by the slightest trace or feeling or upsetting opinion. He uses terms like `copulate', `sexual congress', `have relations with' (to men sexual relations is a redundancy), overlaid with stilted manners; the suit on the chimp.
Money, Marriage and Prostitution, Work and Prevention of an Automated Society: There is no human reason for money or for anyone to work more than two or three hours a week at the very most. All non-creative jobs (practically all jobs now being done) could have been automated long ago, and in a moneyless society everyone can have as much of the best of everything as she wants. But there are non-human, male reasons for wanting to maintain the money system:
1. Pussy. Despising his highly inadequate self, overcome with intense anxiety and a deep, profound loneliness when by his empty self, desperate to attach himself to any female in dim hopes of completing himself, in the mystical belief that by touching gold he'll turn to gold, the male craves the continuous companionship of women. The company of the lowest female is preferable to his own or that of other men, who serve only to remind him of his repulsiveness. But females, unless very young or very sick, must be coerced or bribed into male company.
2. Supply the non-relating male with the delusion of usefulness, and enable him to try to justify his existence by digging holes and then filling them up. Leisure time horrifies the male, who will have nothing to do but contemplate his grotesque self. Unable to relate or to love, the male must work. Females crave absorbing, emotionally satisfying, meaningful activity, but lacking the opportunity or ability for this, they prefer to idle and waste away their time in ways of their own choosing -- sleeping, shopping, bowling, shooting pool, playing cards and other games, breeding, reading, walking around, daydreaming, eating, playing with themselves, popping pills, going to the movies, getting analyzed, traveling, raising dogs and cats, lolling about on the beach, swimming, watching TV, listening to music, decorating their houses, gardening, sewing, nightclubbing, dancing, visiting, `improving their minds' (taking courses), and absorbing `culture' (lectures, plays, concerts, `arty' movies). Therefore, many females would, even assuming complete economic equality between the sexes, prefer living with males or peddling their asses on the street, thus having most of their time for themselves, to spending many hours of their days doing boring, stultifying, non-creative work for someone else, functioning as less than animals, as machines, or, at best -- if able to get a `good' job -- co-managing the shitpile. What will liberate women, therefore, from male control is the total elimination of the money-work system, not the attainment of economic equality with men within it.
3. Power and control. Unmasterful in his personal relations with women, the male attains to masterfulness by the manipulation of money and everything controlled by money, in other words, of everything and everybody.
4. Love substitute. Unable to give love or affection, the male gives money. It makes him feel motherly. The mother gives milk; he gives bread. He is the Breadwinner.
5. Provide the male with a goal. Incapable of enjoying the moment, the male needs something to look forward to, and money provides him with an eternal, never-ending goal: Just think of what you could do with 80 trillion dollars -- invest it! And in three years time you'd have 300 trillion dollars!!!
6. Provide the basis for the male's major opportunity to control and manipulate -- fatherhood.
Fatherhood and Mental Illness (fear, cowardice, timidity, humility, insecurity, passivity): Mother wants what's best for her kids; Daddy only wants what's best for Daddy, that is peace and quiet, pandering to his delusion of dignity (`respect'), a good reflection on himself (status) and the opportunity to control and manipulate, or, if he's an `enlightened' father, to `give guidance'. His daughter, in addition, he wants sexually -- he givers her hand in marriage; the other part is for him. Daddy, unlike Mother, can never give in to his kids, as he must, at all costs, preserve his delusion of decisiveness, forcefulness, always-rightness and strength. Never getting one's way leads to lack of self-confidence in one's ability to cope with the world and to a passive acceptance of the status quo. Mother loves her kids, although she sometimes gets angry, but anger blows over quickly and even while it exists, doesn't preclude love and basic acceptance. Emotionally diseased Daddy doesn't love his kids; he approves of them -- if they're `good', that is, if they're nice, `respectful', obedient, subservient to his will, quiet and not given to unseemly displays of temper that would be most upsetting to Daddy's easily disturbed male nervous system -- in other words, if they're passive vegetables. If they're not `good', he doesn't get angry -- not if he's a modern, `civilized' father (the old-fashioned ranting, raving brute is preferable, as he is so ridiculous he can be easily despised) -- but rather express disapproval, a state that, unlike anger, endures and precludes a basic acceptance, leaving the kid with the feeling of worthlessness and a lifelong obsession wit being approved of; the result is fear of independent thought, as this leads to unconventional, disapproved of opinions and way of life.
For the kid to want Daddy's approval it must respect Daddy, and being garbage, Daddy can make sure that he is respected only by remaining aloof, by distantness, by acting on the precept of `familiarity breeds contempt', which is, of course, true, if one is contemptible. By being distant and aloof, he is able to remain unknown, mysterious, and thereby, to inspire fear (`respect').
Disapproval of emotional `scenes' leads to fear of strong emotion, fear of one's own anger and hatred. Fear of anger and hatred combined with a lack of self-confidence in one's ability to cope with and change the world, or even to affect in the slightest way one's own destiny, leads to a mindless belief that the world and most people in it are nice and the most banal, trivial amusements are great fun and deeply pleasurable.
The affect of fatherhood on males, specifically, is to make them `Men', that is, highly defensive of all impulses to passivity, faggotry, and of desires to be female. Every boy wants to imitate his mother, be her, fuse with her, but Daddy forbids this; he is the mother; he gets to fuse with her. So he tells the boy, sometimes directly, sometimes indirectly, to not be a sissy, to act like a `Man'. The boy, scared shitless of and `respecting' his father, complies, and becomes just like Daddy, that model of `Man'-hood, the all-American ideal -- the well-behaved heterosexual dullard.
The effect of fatherhood on females is to make them male -- dependent, passive, domestic, animalistic, insecure, approval and security seekers, cowardly, humble, `respectful' of authorities and men, closed, not fully responsive, half-dead, trivial, dull, conventional, flattened-out and thoroughly contemptible. Daddy's Girl, always tense and fearful, uncool, unanalytical, lacking objectivity, appraises Daddy, and thereafter, other men, against a background of fear (`respect') and is not only unable to see the empty shell behind the facade, but accepts the male definition of himself as superior, as a female, and of herself, as inferior, as a male, which, thanks to Daddy, she really is.
It is the increase of fatherhood, resulting from the increased and more widespread affluence that fatherhood needs in order to thrive, that has caused the general increase of mindlessness and the decline of women in the United States since the 1920s. The close association of affluence with fatherhood has led, for the most part, to only the wrong girls, namely, the `privileged' middle class girls, getting `educated'.
The effect of fathers, in sum, has been to corrode the world with maleness. The male has a negative Midas Touch -- everything he touches turns to shit.
Suppression of Individuality, Animalism (domesticity and motherhood), and Functionalism: The male is just a bunch of conditioned reflexes, incapable of a mentally free response; he is tied to he earliest conditioning, determined completely by his past experiences. His earliest experiences are with his mother, and he is throughout his life tied to her. It never becomes completely clear to the make that he is not part of his mother, that he is he and she is she.
His greatest need is to be guided, sheltered, protected and admired by Mama (men expect women to adore what men shrink from in horror -- themselves) and, being completely physical, he yearns to spend his time (that's not spent `out in the world' grimly defending against his passivity) wallowing in basic animal activities -- eating, sleeping, shitting, relaxing and being soothed by Mama. Passive, rattle-headed Daddy's Girl, ever eager for approval, for a pat on the head, for the `respect' if any passing piece of garbage, is easily reduced to Mama, mindless ministrator to physical needs, soother of the weary, apey brow, booster of the tiny ego, appreciator of the contemptible, a hot water bottle with tits.
The reduction to animals of the women of the most backward segment of society -- the `privileged, educated' middle-class, the backwash of humanity -- where Daddy reigns supreme, has been so thorough that they try to groove on labour pains and lie around in the most advanced nation in the world in the middle of the twentieth century with babies chomping away on their tits. It's not for the kids sake, though, that the `experts' tell women that Mama should stay home and grovel in animalism, but for Daddy's; the tits for Daddy to hang onto; the labor pains for Daddy to vicariously groove on (half dead, he needs awfully strong stimuli to make him respond).
Reducing the female to an animal, to Mama, to a male, is necessary for psychological as well as practical reasons: the male is a mere member of the species, interchangeable with every other male. He has no deep-seated individuality, which stems from what intrigues you, what outside yourself absorbs you, what you're in relation to. Completely self-absorbed, capable of being in relation only to their bodies and physical sensations, males differ from each other only to the degree and in the ways they attempt to defend against their passivity and against their desire to be female.
The female's individuality, which he is acutely aware of, but which he doesn't comprehend and isn't capable of relating to or grasping emotionally, frightens and upsets him and fills him with envy. So he denies it in her and proceeds to define everyone in terms of his or her function or use, assigning to himself, of course, the most important functions -- doctor, president, scientist -- therefore providing himself with an identity, if not individuality, and tries to convince himself and women (he's succeeded best at convincing women) that the female function is to bear and raise children and to relax, comfort and boost the ego if the male; that her function is such as to make her interchangeable with every other female. In actual fact, the female function is to relate, groove, love and be herself, irreplaceable by anyone else; the male function is to produce sperm. We now have sperm banks.
In actual fact, the female function is to explore, discover, invent, solve problems crack jokes, make music -- all with love. In other words, create a magic world.
Prevention of Privacy: Although the male, being ashamed of what he is and almost of everything he does, insists on privacy and secrecy in all aspects of his life, he has no real regard for privacy. Being empty, not being a complete, separate being, having no self to groove on and needing to be constantly in female company, he sees nothing at all wrong in intruding himself on any woman's thoughts, even a total stranger's, anywhere at any time, but rather feels indignant and insulted when put down for doing so, as well as confused -- he can't, for the life of him, understand why anyone would prefer so much as one minute of solitude to the company of any creep around. Wanting to become a woman, he strives to be constantly around females, which is the closest he can get to becoming one, so he created a `society' based upon the family -- a male-female could and their kids (the excuse for the family's existence), who live virtually on top of one another, unscrupuluously violating the females' rights, privacy and sanity.
Isolation, Suburbs, and Prevention of Community: Our society is not a community, but merely a collection of isolated family units. Desperately insecure, fearing his woman will leave him if she is exposed to other men or to anything remotely resembling life, the male seeks to isolate her from other men and from what little civilization there is, so he moves her out to the suburbs, a collection of self-absorbed couples and their kids. Isolation enables him to try to maintain his pretense of being an individual nu becoming a `rugged individualist', a loner, equating non-cooperation and solitariness with individuality.
There is yet another reason for the male to isolate himself: every man is an island. Trapped inside himself, emotionally isolated, unable to relate, the male has a horror of civilization, people, cities, situations requiring an ability to understand and relate to people. So like a scared rabbit, he scurries off, dragging Daddy's little asshole with him to the wilderness, suburbs, or, in the case of the hippy -- he's way out, Man! -- all the way out to the cow pasture where he can fuck and breed undisturbed and mess around with his beads and flute.
The `hippy', whose desire to be a `Man', a `rugged individualist', isn't quite as strong as the average man's, and who, in addition, is excited by the thought having lots of women accessible to him, rebels against the harshness of a Breadwinner's life and the monotony of one woman. In the name of sharing and cooperation, he forms a commune or tribe, which, for all its togetherness and partly because of it, (the commune, being an extended family, is an extended violation of the female's rights, privacy and sanity) is no more a community than normal `society'.
A true community consists of individuals -- not mere species members, not couples -- respecting each others individuality and privacy, at the same time interacting with each other mentally and emotionally -- free spirits in free relation to each other -- and co-operating with each other to achieve common ends. Traditionalists say the basic unit of `society' is the family; `hippies' say the tribe; no one says the individual.
The `hippy' babbles on about individuality, but has no more conception of it than any other man. He desires to get back to Nature, back to the wilderness, back to the home of furry animals that he's one of, away from the city, where there is at least a trace, a bare beginning of civilization, to live at the species level, his time taken up with simple, non-intellectual activities -- farming, fucking, bead stringing. The most important activity of the commune, the one upon which it is based, is gang-banging. The `hippy' is enticed to the commune mainly by the prospect for free pussy -- the main commodity to be shared, to be had just for the asking, but, blinded by greed, he fails to anticipate all the other men he has to share with, or the jealousies and possessiveness for the pussies themselves.
Men cannot co-operate to achieve a common end, because each man's end is all the pussy for himself. The commune, therefore, is doomed to failure; each `hippy' will, in panic, grad the first simpleton who digs him and whisks her off to the suburbs as fast as he can. The male cannot progress socially, but merely swings back and forth from isolation to gang-banging.
Conformity: Although he wants to be an individual, the male is scared of anything in himself that is the slightest bit different from other men, it causes him to suspect that he's not really a `Man', that he's passive and totally sexual, a highly upsetting suspicion. If other men are "A" and he's not, he must not be a man; he must be a fag. So he tries to affirm his `Manhood' by being like all the other men. Differentness in other men, as well as himself, threatens him; it means they're fags whom he must at all costs avoid, so he tries to make sure that all other men conform.
The male dares to be different to the degree that he accepts his passivity and his desire to be female, his fagginess. The farthest out male is the drag queen, but he, although different from most men, is exactly like all the other drag queens like the functionalist, he has an identity -- he is female. He tries to define all his troubles away -- but still no individuality. Not completely convinced that he's a woman, highly insecure about being sufficiently female, he conforms compulsively to the man-made stereotype, ending up as nothing but a bundle of stilted mannerisms.
To be sure he's a `Man', the male must see to it that the female be clearly a `Woman', the opposite of a `Man', that is, the female must act like a faggot. And Daddy's Girl, all of whose female instincts were wrenched out of her when little, easily and obligingly adapts herself to the role.
Authority and Government: Having no sense of right and wrong, no conscience, which can only stem from having an ability to empathize with others... having no faith in his non-existent self, being unnecessarily competitive, and by nature, unable to co-operate, the male feels a need for external guidance and control. So he created authorities -- priests, experts, bosses, leaders, etc -- and government. Wanting the female (Mama) to guide him, but unable to accept this fact (he is, after all, a MAN), wanting to play Woman, to usurp her function as Guider and Protector, he sees to it that all authorities are male.
There's no reason why a society consisting of rational beings capable of empathizing with each other, complete and having no natural reason to compete, should have a government, laws or leaders.
Philosophy, Religion, and Morality Based on Sex: The male's inability to relate to anybody or anything makes his life pointless and meaningless (the ultimate male insight is that life is absurd), so he invented philosophy and religion. Being empty, he looks outward, not only for guidance and control, but for salvation and for the meaning of life. Happiness being for him impossible on this earth, he invented Heaven.
For a man, having no ability to empathize with others and being totally sexual, `wrong' is sexual `license' and engaging in `deviant' (`unmanly') sexual practices, that is, not defending against his passivity and total sexuality which, if indulged, would destroy `civilization', since `civilization' is based entirely upon the male need to defend himself against these characteristics. For a woman (according to men), `wrong' is any behavior that would entice men into sexual `license' -- that is, not placing male needs above her own and not being a faggot.
Religion not only provides the male with a goal (Heaven) and helps keep women tied to men, but offers rituals through which he can try to expiate the guilt and shame he feels at not defending himself enough against his sexual impulses; in essence, that guilt and shame he feels at being male.
Most men men, utterly cowardly, project their inherent weaknesses onto women, label them female weaknesses and believe themselves to have female strengths; most philosophers, not quite so cowardly, face the fact that make lacks exist in men, but still can't face the fact that they exist in men only. So they label the male condition the Human Condition, post their nothingness problem, which horrifies them, as a philosophical dilemma, thereby giving stature to their animalism, grandiloquently label their nothingness their `Identity Problem', and proceed to prattle on pompously about the `Crisis of the Individual', the `Essence of Being', `Existence preceding Essence', `Existential Modes of Being', etc. etc.
A woman not only takes her identity and individuality for granted, but knows instinctively that the only wrong is to hurt others, and that the meaning of life is love.
Prejudice (racial, ethnic, religious, etc): The male needs scapegoats onto whom he can project his failings and inadequacies and upon whom he can vent his frustration at not being female. And the vicarious discriminations have the practical advantage of substantially increasing the pussy pool available to the men on top.
Competition, Prestige, Status, Formal Education, Ignorance and Social and Economic Classes: Having an obsessive desire to be admired by women, but no intrinsic worth, the make constructs a highly artificial society enabling him to appropriate the appearance of worth through money, prestige, `high' social class, degrees, professional position and knowledge and, by pushing as many other men as possible down professionally, socially, economically, and educationally.
The purpose of `higher' education is not to educate but to exclude as many as possible from the various professions.
The male, totally physical, incapable of mental rapport, although able to understand and use knowledge and ideas, is unable to relate to them, to grasp them emotionally: he does not value knowledge and ideas for their own sake (they're just means to ends) and, consequently, feels no need for mental companions, no need to cultivate the intellectual potentialities of others. On the contrary, the male has a vested interest in ignorance; it gives the few knowledgeable men a decided edge on the unknowledgeable ones, and besides, the male knows that an enlightened, aware female population will mean the end of him. The healthy, conceited female wants the company of equals whom she can respect and groove on; the male and the sick, insecure, unself-confident male female crave the company of worms.
No genuine social revolution can be accomplished by the male, as the male on top wants the status quo, and all the male on the bottom wants is to be the male on top. The male `rebel' is a farce; this is the male's `society', made by him to satisfy his needs. He's never satisfied, because he's not capable of being satisfied. Ultimately, what the male `rebel' is rebelling against is being male. The male changes only when forced to do so by technology, when he has no choice, when `society' reaches the stage where he must change or die. We're at that stage now; if women don't get their asses in gear fast, we may very well all die.
Prevention of Conversation: Being completely self-centered and unable to relate to anything outside himself, the male's `conversation', when not about himself, is an impersonal droning on, removed from anything of human value. Male `intellectual conversation' is a strained compulsive attempt to impress the female.
Daddy's Girl, passive, adaptable, respectful of and in awe of the male, allows him to impose his hideously dull chatter on her. This is not too difficult for her, as the tension and anxiety, the lack of cool, the insecurity and self-doubt, the unsureness of her own feelings and sensations that Daddy instilled in her make her perceptions superficial and render her unable to see that the male's babble is babble; like the aesthete `appreciating' the blob that's labeled `Great Art', she believes she's grooving on what bores the shit out of her. Not only does she permit his babble to dominate, she adapts her own `conversation' accordingly.
Trained from an early childhood in niceness, politeness and `dignity', in pandering to the male need to disguise his animalism, she obligingly reduces her own `conversation' to small talk, a bland, insipid avoidance of any topic beyond the utterly trivial -- or is `educated', to `intellectual' discussion, that is, impersonal discoursing on irrelevant distractions -- the Gross National Product, the Common Market, the influence of Rimbaud on symbolist painting. So adept is she at pandering that it eventually becomes second nature and she continues to pander to men even when in the company of other females only.
Apart from pandering, her `conversation' is further limited by her insecurity about expressing deviant, original opinions and the self-absorption based on insecurity and that prevents her conversation from being charming. Niceness, politeness, `dignity', insecurity and self-absorption are hardly conducive to intensity and wit, qualities a conversation must have to be worthy of the name. Such conversation is hardly rampant, as only completely self-confident, arrogant, outgoing, proud, tough-minded females are capable of intense, bitchy, witty conversation.

Top Ten reasons of the day to hate men

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:38:54 GMT

10. Men in Jerusalem beat a woman for not sitting in the back of the bus. People blamed her for not “knowing her place”.

9. In the US, a man rapes a woman every 6 minutes, and it is still so taboo to talk about who does all the raping that this ongoing crime against women by men is euphemistically referred to by saying “a woman is raped every 6 minutes”. By what? The sun? The moon? Marshmallows? No - by men. But people are so afraid of men they don’t even want to say that, even though men are over 99% of all rapists.

8. Man tries to electrocute his wife because she wanted a divorce. Gee, I can’t imagine why she would have wanted to leave such an awesome dude.

7. Man goes around murdering members of the class of women forced into sexual slavery to men to earn a living (prostitutes); male police response? To tell them (and other women) not to go outside, because men expect women to live under house arrest for the “crime” of being female.

6. 800,000 humans are sold into sexual slavery every year. Despite the neutral tone of the article which says the sex slaves are “women, children and men” the vast majority are women and female children, and virtually all of the slave owners are men. The quibbling point of this article? To try to get people to stop using the shiny happy “sex positive” propaganda term “sex worker” to describe these KIDNAPPED SLAVES.

5. Man attempts to murder his girlfriend’s child, and may well have succeeded, although the doctors are trying to save the child’s life.

4. Rich man makes a killing by knowingly creating child porn by getting teen girls drunk and filming them in various states of undress or sexual activity - gets convicted and receives - a few hours a week of community service for two and a half years and a fine which amounts to only a tiny fraction of what he made off selling the child porn he created.

3. Armed man in Phoenix is serially raping little girls in who live in low income housing.

2. In India, virulent misogyny and the knowledge that a daughter will have no future have led to widespread female infanticide and sex selective abortions performed to prevent female fetuses from being born, at the rate of SEVEN THOUSAND PER DAY.

1. While women’s educational and professional credentials continue to climb, the wage gap between men and women remains firmly in place. Men own the companies and sign the checks, and they sure aren’t going to pay a woman fairly for her labor.

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:57:17 GMT

I hate men. Yes, I am a feminist. No, not all feminists hate men. But at this point in my life I have begun to wonder why any woman with half a brain would NOT hate men. It is perhaps testament to the amazing moral superiority of women that most women do not hate men in spite of the tortures men inflict upon them, their children, and each other. Or perhaps it is a reason why feminism has not succeeded. Perhaps in order for women to stop being chattel under the bootheels of cruel, stupid men, they will have to learn to hate men at least a little.

This journal will consist of a list of good reasons to hate men.

I will grant the naysayers this - that the actions which make men, as a class, hateable, are not engaged in or supported, even passively, by all men. In other words, there are probably a few good men out there, who really do not condone in any way, shape or form, any of the following:

Rape
Murder
War
Environmental destruction for the sake of "jobs"
Wife beating
Girlfriend beating
Porn
BDSM
Street harassment of women
Forced veiling of women
Incest
Statutory rape
Forced pregnancy and birth
Giving fetii more rights than the women in whose bodies they are growing

But I haven't personally met any. I've heard of a precious few via their writings in print and online. Less than ten. Out of thousands of men I have met in my life, I can count the "good" ones on one hand. And what I listed above as a description of "good" is, for me, not even "good" but just "not bad", as in "not evil and unempathetic".
Every man I have had personal interactions with supports at least 2-3 of the above things, or engages in them.

Every single one.

That is, in and of itself, enough to make any sensible woman want to run away to join an Amazonian cult. Alas, I am not able to do so. But I can bitch about how much I hate men on LJ.
And you know, for a start, maybe that's enough. Men have such fragile and pathetic little egos that even though they enjoy almost complete and total world domination, they are awfully threatened by women speaking up for themselves even a little bit. This is why even the most timid feminist woman saying "perhaps maybe you guys should look at this particular instance of gross mistreatment of women and realize that it isn't in the spirit of fair play" will get buried under a mountain of hate mail from offended penis owners who insist she must be a man-hater because she isn't begging to suck their ugly cocks in overawed gratitude for their gracious gift of allowing her to continue breathing. So I can imagine how they will look at this journal.

So in order to piss them off even more, their comments will not be allowed to appear here. This is a no males zone. Only friends may comment here and no male person shall be friended, nor shall any female apologist for males. Transwomen I shall consider female and allow to post here under the same rules an non-transwomen - if they will not speak up in defense of males. No female bashing is allowed here. No male praising is allowed here. That you can get a plenty in every other sector of the world.

This is a female safe zone, a feminist safe zone, a girl and woman and transwoman safe zone, a place where males will get the verbal bashing they deserve. If you BOYS don't like it, you don't have to read it. If you get a mental wedgie from reading it, that's your own fucking problem.

But perhaps hate is not the correct word in the end. To paraphrase one of that tiny number of men I repsect for not being a total shit, "Hate is not an emotion, hate is behavior." I have extreme dislike towards men, but I do not: beat them; rape them; kill them; stalk them; take away their civil liberties; agitate for laws to be passed that impede upon their reproductive choices; advocate that they be raped for misbehaving; or any of the tortures inflicted upon women so often they no don't even make the back page of the newspaper unless the crime has some particular sensationalistic value. A lot is said about how women who stand up for themselves hate men. Very little is said about the obvious and ubiquitous hatred of most men for women.

Well, I'll have a lot to say about it here.